Greece remains under strict ban on surrogacy for LGBT couples

Greece is preparing to legalize same-sex marriage, but without granting the right to parenthood through surrogacy.

Surrogacy: Greece stays strict on LGBT couples 

In Greece, the issue of legalizing same-sex marriage caused controversy in society even before the government introduced a bill on the issue. Some see it as a move towards greater equality, while others see it as an attack on traditional family values. Penny and her partner want to get married and have children, but they don’t seem to be given access to surrogacy or other methods of reproductive assistance. Their only option would be adoption.

Penny Moisiadouemphasizes that adoption is a noble act. She expresses her support for adoption, but under certain circumstances. If she were single and unable to have a child of her own, she would consider adoption. However, since she has a partner, they have the opportunity to have their own child. She questions why such discrimination exists. According to her, when getting married, both the procedure and the mentality of others should change. However, she is surprised that despite the marriage, she was deprived of this right to raise a child, which she had before.

The ban on surrogacy will also apply to same-sex male couples who wish to have children. This means that they will not be able to turn to surrogate mothers to become parents. However, if they decide to use the services of a surrogate abroad, the child will still be recognized in Greece. Konstantinos Pantos, an obstetrician-gynecologist and head of the Hellenic Society of Reproductive Medicine, expressed the opinion that the state should take clear and reasonable steps in this situation.

He emphasizes the importance of following the laws and regulations in this matter, rather than trying to circumvent them. Pantos notes that some married lesbian women are seeking ways to legally have children. For example, they may decide to divorce, go to a reproductive center and give birth to a child as a single woman, after which it is possible to remarry. It calls for legal and ethical discussions of these issues to find solutions that meet all sides of the issue.

Euronews’ Fay Dulgheri says the government is committed to promoting marriage equality in line with election promises to eliminate discrimination. There are fierce debates on this topic in society, where participants discuss the political, social, ethical and legal aspects of this problem.

LGBT and surrogacy: differences in laws between countries

Surrogacy and its status for LGBT couples vary depending on the laws of different countries. In some countries, such as the USA, Canada, Great Britain, Greece, Holland, Belgium, Denmark, Ireland and others, surrogacy is allowed and available to LGBT couples. In the US, for example, surrogacy laws vary from state to state, and some states allow surrogacy for LGBT couples. Canada also has legislation allowing surrogacy for LGBT couples. In the UK, Greece, Holland, Belgium, Denmark and Ireland, surrogacy laws also take into account the needs of LGBT families. However, it should be remembered that each country has its own specific legislation, and a detailed study of the relevant rules and procedures for LGBT couples wishing to use surrogacy is required.

A place of freedom and joy: the atmosphere of LGBT parties in America

The LGBT party atmosphere in America is unique and inspiring. These events have become a place where people with different sexual orientations and gender identities can meet in a safe and supportive environment. There is an atmosphere of joy, fun and mutual understanding here, which makes every party especially attractive to many. Let’s dive into the world of LGBT parties in America and find out what makes them so unique and meaningful to the community.

Fun, friendship, inclusion: what awaits at LGBT parties in America

LGBT parties in America may vary depending on the city, location, and organizer, but the general features and atmosphere are usually similar. They are a place where people with different sexual orientations and gender identities can meet, socialize, and break away from their daily routine.

Meetings often take place in nightclubs or bars, decorated in bright and colorful colors, with LGBTQ+ symbols such as rainbow flags. The musical repertoire often includes popular hits that lift your spirits and make you want to dance. DJs and artists, themselves members of the LGBT community, are often the life of the party, creating an atmosphere of joy, celebration and understanding.

LGBT parties often feature various entertainment events, such as karaoke, competitions, show programs and drag queen performances. This adds variety and allows everyone to find something to suit their taste.

One of the key aspects of LGBT parties is a safe and supportive environment where everyone can be themselves, express their individuality and feel accepted. Tolerance, respect for differences and openness to new acquaintances and friendships make these parties especially attractive to many.

LGBT parties in America also often serve as a platform for charity fundraisers, educational events, or events to fight for the rights of the LGBT community. They help strengthen connections within the community, raise awareness of issues and events, and promote values ​​of inclusion and equality.

Thus, LGBT parties in America provide not only a place for fun and entertainment, but also a platform for social activity, support and communication, helping to strengthen and promote the values ​​of the LGBTQ+ community.

The importance of LGBT charity events: the example of HRC Gala and Pride Parade

LGBT charitable events play a significant role in supporting and developing the LGBTQ+ community, as well as raising funds for charitable programs and organizations that help those who need support and protection. Take, for example, the Human Rights Campaign’s (HRC) annual charity gala, one of the largest in the United States, raising tens of thousands of dollars to support the rights of LGBTQ+ people.

HRC actively works to protect the rights of LGBTQ+ citizens and fight discrimination at various levels. Her charity events not only raise financial support, but also raise awareness of important issues related to the rights of the LGBTQ+ community. The HRC Gala features celebrity auctions that raise significant amounts of money to support the organization’s activities.

Another example of an LGBT charity event is the annual Pride Parade, which takes place in various cities around the world. These events not only serve as a celebration of pride and joy, but are also an opportunity to raise funds to support LGBTQ+ organizations, educational programs, and assistance to LGBTQ+ youth and other vulnerable groups.

LGBT charitable events support a variety of initiatives and programs aimed at increasing awareness, education, access to healthcare and legal services for LGBTQ+ people. For example, events organized by the Trevor Project help combat the problem of suicide among LGBTQ+ youth and provide 24-hour support and counseling.

Additionally, LGBT charity events help create a community where LGBTQ+ people can feel accepted, supported and understood. They also enable the development of social connections, strengthen solidarity and demonstrate the importance of inclusion and equality for all citizens, regardless of their sexual orientation or gender identity.

Thus, LGBT charitable events are not only a way to raise funds, but also a means of actively supporting and protecting the rights and interests of the LGBTQ+ community, helping to create a more open, tolerant and inclusive society.

A story of joy: Two LGBT+ women became pregnant from the same donor and are expecting birth almost simultaneously

In London, two women who are part of an LGBT+ couple are expecting a baby after using sperm from the same donor. Emily, 38, and Carrie, 35, are in the process of preparing for motherhood.

Secrets of donation: Who became the ideal donor for women

The women spent £25,000 on the insemination procedure. The donor was an American with Dutch-German roots. Before the procedure itself, the women received detailed information about his biography, pedigree, looked at his childhood photographs, listened to a recording of his voice and even checked his handwriting.

“We also know how he makes a living, his hobbies, likes and dislikes. We even know he has long fingers and high cheekbones,” says mother-to-be Kerry.

The donor also made a significant charitable donation to the clinic. This will ensure that future children have complete information about their biological father as soon as they turn 18. Despite the fact that pregnancies occur simultaneously, the boys carried by women will be born with a short time interval of a few weeks. Emily and Kerry are looking forward to the arrival of their children and the joys of motherhood.

Being born LGBT+: an example of acceptance and evolution in modern society

The birth of a child in an LGBT+ family is one of the important moments that demonstrates the evolution and inclusiveness of modern society. This event not only brings joy to parents, but also serves as an example of accepting diversity in family patterns.

One of the key features of having a child in an LGBT+ family is the use of assisted reproduction methods such as sperm or egg donation. These methods allow same-sex couples to have biological offspring and fulfill their desire to become parents.

However, the process of preparing for the birth of a child for an LGBT+ couple may involve additional steps, such as choosing a sperm or egg donor, medical procedures and legal aspects related to establishing parental rights.

It is important to note that the birth of a child in an LGBT+ family is no less significant and loved than in traditional families. For expectant parents, this often becomes a center of attention and a source of joy, and for society, it is a reason for awareness of the diversity of family forms.

In addition, the birth of a child in an LGBT+ family helps to expand understanding and tolerance in society. This sparks discussion about the rights and protection of LGBT+ families, and helps create a friendlier and more inclusive environment for all members of society.

Thus, the birth of a child in an LGBT+ family is not only a joyful event for parents, but also a step towards a more harmonious and understanding society, where every family has the right to happiness and children, regardless of their orientation or gender.

Historical fine for distributing a book about homosexuality

The Lira bookstore chain was fined 12 million forints. This fine was imposed due to the sale of Alice Osman’s comic book “Heartstopper”, which tells the story of the romantic relationship of two young men.

Heartstopper сomics: Lira fined for violating Hungarian laws

Recorded in the history of the Hungarian book trade, a fine of 12 million forints, equivalent to approximately 32,000 euros, was imposed on the Lira bookstore chain for selling books with homosexual content in an “inappropriate form” – without a clear plastic wrapper. Lira, the main competitor of state-owned Libri, faced such a fine for the first time in its history. The object of the dispute was Alice Osman’s comic book “Heartstopper”, which tells about the romantic relationship of two young men..

According to Hungarian law, books with content considered unsuitable for children must be packaged in transparent film to prevent access to the content by minors. However, Lira broke this rule by selling the “Heartstopper” comic without such packaging. As a result, they were fined a record amount, causing outrage and controversy in the community.

According to Cristiana Nyari, Líra’s creative director, there are many ambiguities in the Child Protection Act, making it difficult for retailers to comply if they do not understand what is required of them. “One can argue about what books should be provided to children aged 3-4 years, whether they should contain sexuality or not. But this decision should be made by the parents, as previously stated by the state. However, now the state is trying to interfere in everything. It is absolutely unacceptable for teenagers aged 16 or 17 to have someone else determine what they are allowed to read,” Nyari said. Líra management said it would use all available legal means to challenge the decision and have it overturned.

Ban on visiting the exhibition for minors: the situation in Budapest

The Hungarian National Museum has banned minors from visiting the international exhibition World Press Photo, even with parental consent. The decision came after several photographs in the exhibition depicted members of the LGBT community in the Philippines. Parliamentarians said the images violated a recently passed law banning the dissemination of LGBT propaganda to minors. Now, persons under 18 years of age cannot visit the museum, even with parental permission. The exhibition organizers expressed their apologies and noted that this is the first time such a situation has occurred in Europe.

This decision caused public discontent and led to widespread debate about freedom of expression and access to information. Many critics argue that banning minors from the exhibition is a form of censorship and a restriction of citizens’ rights to receive information. The organizers of the exhibition expressed regret over the situation and emphasized that their goal was simply to show the diversity of world journalistic photography. However, the museum and the deputies who supported the ban insist on the need to comply with the law and protect the rights of minors.

The ban on visiting the exhibition caused a stir not only within the country, but also abroad. Many international human rights organizations expressed their disagreement with this decision, calling it discriminatory and violating the principles of freedom of speech. They call on the Hungarian authorities to reconsider this decision and ensure equal access to cultural events for all citizens, regardless of age. At the same time, supporters of the ban argue that this is a necessary measure to protect young people from negative influences and propaganda that could affect their worldview and moral values.

Queer cinema and communication: how LGBT+ people unite in the fight for rights and recognition

LGBT+ people often gather to watch queer films together, creating a comfortable and supportive atmosphere. These events can take place at home with friends or partners, at special film screenings or theme nights in LGBT+ bars or cultural centers. For many LGBT+ people, watching queer films is not only entertainment, but also a way to identify with the characters and stories, and discuss important topics related to their own experiences and community issues. Such events also help to form bonds, exchange ideas and support each other in the fight for equal rights and recognition.

Queer films, or films with LGBT+ themes, play an important role in modern cinema, drawing attention to various aspects of gender and sexual identity. They represent a diverse film genre including drama, comedy, documentaries, arthouse and more, and they often reflect real life situations and issues faced by members of the LGBT+ community.

Queer films have a significant impact on public opinion and help change attitudes towards LGBT+ people. They help to understand complex issues of sexual orientation and gender identity, and expand understanding of various aspects of LGBT+ culture and community.

One of the key functions of queer cinema is to provide a platform for the voices and stories of LGBT+ people to be expressed. Films of this genre often highlight issues related to discrimination, stigmatization, and identify problems of family relationships, friendship, love and self-identity. They help create public dialogue and draw attention to issues of equity and inclusion.

Reflecting destinies and struggles: the role of queer cinematography in promoting LGBT+ rights

Among the famous queer films are such masterpieces as “Brockback Mountain”, “Kaleidoscope”, “The Silence of the Lambs”, “The Paris We Knew”, “Parallel Moms”, “Magnificent Marcy”, “Love, Simon”, “ Dungeon”, “Handsome People”, and many others. These films received widespread acclaim and became symbols of the fight for LGBT+ rights.

Queer films also play an important role in shaping the cultural heritage of the LGBT+ community. They help preserve and communicate the stories and experiences of LGBT+ people, and provide a forum for creative expression and exploration of gender identity. In addition, they promote the development of creative talent and recognition of the contributions of LGBT+ artists and directors to the cinematic arts.

Overall, queer films are an important tool for promoting inclusivity, tolerance and understanding of diversity. They not only reflect the reality of life for LGBT+ people, but also inspire change in society and create a more equal world for all its members.

Queer films also often act as catalysts for social change and political debate. They spark discussions on issues related to human rights, marriage laws, adoption, and the social and cultural inclusion of the LGBT+ community. Many films raise issues related to violence and discrimination, which helps to draw attention to these problems and contribute to their solution.

Resonance in the EU: Condemnation of recent actions against LGBT people in Russia

The decision by the Russian Supreme Court, recognizing the “international LGBT social movement” (which doesn’t exist) as “extremist” and prohibiting its activities in Russia, was strongly condemned by the European Union. Josep Borrell, the EU High Representative for Foreign and Security Policy, made this statement.

As a senior EU diplomat noted, the Russian court’s decision creates obstacles for LGBTIQ people to exercise their rights and maintain their dignity due to fears of unjustified persecution. This decision raises serious concerns in the international community as it threatens the foundations of freedom and equality before the law. Such actions highlight the need to protect human rights and  Prevent bias stemming from sexual orientation or gender identity. “Against the backdrop of years of violations of the rights of the LGBTIQ community that began under Putin’s presidency, this decision is designed to continue the persecution of the LGBTIQ community in Russia and is aimed at suppressing civil society and those who fearlessly defend human rights,” he said.

Borrell reiterated that the EU insists on the principle of non-discrimination against people and calls on the Russian Federation to immediately end arbitrary suppression, adhere to its global commitments  and ensure “respect, protection and exercise of human rights equally for all.”

The ban was imposed by the Supreme Court of Russia. the activities of an LGBT organization that was claimed to be non-existent

Prior to this, the Supreme Court of Russia, at the request of the Ministry of Justice, declared the activities of the “international LGBT social movement” extremist, which, according to human rights activists, does not actually exist. This court decision was preceded by the adoption of two laws in Russia aimed at harshly persecuting the LGBT community.

First, Russia expanded the application of the law on “LGBT propaganda” to adults – previously it only applied to children. The decision caused significant protest both nationally and globally as many considered it discriminatory and a violation of basic human rights regarding freedom of expression and assembly.

After this, Russian legislation introduced a ban on transgender transition, which included not just altering the gender designation in official paperwork , but also a ban on access to medical procedures necessary for physical transformation. This  prohibition has sparked significant concerns among the medical community and human rights advocates as it hinders the ability to obtain healthcare and threatens the health and well-being of transgender people.

These legislative changes have sparked intense public debate and have been the subject of criticism from many global.

Non-governmental organizations and human rights advocates are urging Russia to adhere to global human rights norms and guarantee equal rights and protections for all its individuals, regardless of their sexual orientation or gender identity.

The Pope has given permission to bless same-sex couples

Now a Catholic priest can bless a union of people of the same sex, but this will happen outside of church rituals and liturgies.

Pope Francis has officially allowed Catholic priests to bless same-sex couples. The move was confirmed in a declaration published by the Vatican’s Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. According to this document, “nonconforming couples” can receive blessings, provided that this occurs outside of church liturgies and rituals. However, the declaration states that the Church’s teaching on marriage between a man and a woman remains unchanged. It is separately noted that the blessing of a same-sex union should not have any similarities with the wedding ceremony, neither in clothing nor in gestures. However, the move represents a departure from the previous principle that God “cannot bless sin” in favor of the principle of the church being “open to one and all.”

Divided opinions: from positive reactions to fears in conservative circles

The Vatican’s announcement was seen by some as a step towards overcoming discrimination in the Catholic Church. However, according to some LGBT rights advocates, the decision highlights the fact that church views still favor heterosexual unions over same-sex couples. While in conservative circles the news caused sharp criticism of the Holy See, which was expressed in outrage and fears of a possible split.

Franca Giansoldati, Vatican correspondent for Messagero, comments on the pontiff’s decision, which raises objections within the church

Pope Francis has approved a document allowing Catholic priests to bless unmarried couples, including same-sex couples. “The Vatican states that blessings should not be part of normal church rituals or associated with civil unions or weddings. In other words, although this is not a liturgical blessing, it represents a significant step in the Catholic Church’s treatment of the LGBTQ community,” it said. Euronews correspondent George Orlandi speaking to the expert.

This is a significant advance. It can almost be compared to the fact that Pope Francis reversed previous decisions made by John Paul II and Pope Benedict, especially considering that in 2021 Pope Francis approved a document denying the possibility of such a move on the part of the church. What has changed during this time? At the last synod, voices appeared calling for such a blessing, for the manifestation of care, these requests were very persistent, and Pope Francis could not ignore them.

However, this move will raise many objections. We are already seeing reactions on social media, mainly from bishops and various church officials expressing their concern. This move has internal consequences for the church, which has never before been as divided as it is today.

Celebrating love, equality and tolerance: annual LGBT march 2024 in Paris

Gay Pride France, also known as the Pride March (Marche des Fiertés) or Paris Gay Pride, is a year-long event dedicated to the rights of the LGBT community and commitment to the principles of equality and tolerance. The parade is one of the most significant events in the calendar of LGBT activism and cultural celebrations in France. Representatives of this community prepare for the event carefully and in advance.

Preparations for the Paris Gay Pride 2024

In preparation for the Paris Gay Pride Parade, representatives of the LGBT community are putting in a lot of effort and planning ahead for various aspects of this celebration of equality and tolerance. Here’s how the preparation happens and what this process includes:

Organization of the event: Preparations for the gay pride parade begin with the formation of an organizing committee, which takes on the task of organizing and coordinating the event. This committee typically includes activists, community leaders, and members of LGBT organizations. Each Pride Parade has a theme and slogan that reflect the important issues and challenges facing the LGBT community at a given time. The theme defines the overall spirit and purpose of the event. To attract participants and spectators, a large-scale advertising and marketing campaign is carried out. This includes creating posters, sharing information on social media and collaborating with the media.Individuals and groups interested in participating in the Pride parade are required to submit their applications beforehand.They can offer their ideas and plans for participating in the event.

Pride parade participants often prepare costumes and symbols that express their individuality and support for the LGBT movement. This may include making rainbow flags, posters, masks and costumes. Gay Pride organizers also ensure the safety of participants and spectators by providing medical services and ensuring safe behavior at the event. Around the gay pride parade, cultural and entertainment events such as concerts, exhibitions and festivals are organized to create a festive atmosphere and support the participants.

Gay Pride also serves as a platform to express demands for equality and fight discrimination. Organizers and participants use the event to promote important social and political messages.

As a result of all these efforts and preparations, the Paris Gay Pride Parade becomes a significant event promoting LGBT rights and maintaining the spirit of equality and tolerance.

Some key points and features of the gay pride parade in France

Story: The first Paris Gay Pride Parade was held in 1981 and has since become an annual event.The idea for the event drew inspiration from comparable gay pride parades held in various cities across the globe.

Venue: The Paris Gay Pride Parade is situated in the heart of the French metropolis, frequently commencing at Rue Marais and concluding at Place de la République. The procession winds its way through the city’s historic neighborhoods, including Marais, Le Marais, and Le Marais.

Participants: The Pride Parade is attended by thousands of people, including members of the LGBT community, their allied organizations, activists and supporters. Event participants often wear costumes, symbols and expressive placards to express their demands and ideas.

Message: The Paris Gay Pride Parade serves as a forum for voicing calls for equal rights and the fight against discrimination rooted in sexual orientation and gender identity. Attendees proudly wave rainbow flags and display signs bearing social and political statements.

Politicians’ participation:The Paris Gay Pride Parade often attracts politicians and public figures who speak out in support of the rights of the LGBT community and make statements about the need to combat discrimination.

Support from organizations:Many LGBT organizations, as well as civil and human rights organizations, actively support and participate in the Paris Gay Pride Parade, highlighting the importance of collaboration to achieve a common goal.

Diversity of crops:Gay Pride in France reflects the diversity of the LGBT community and includes participants from different nationalities, cultures and religious beliefs. This promotes understanding and respect for differences.

International attention:The Paris Gay Pride Parade attracts the attention of global media and organizations outside of France, helping to spread the message of equality and support for the LGBT community on a global scale.

The Paris Gay Pride Parade epitomises the spirit of fighting for rights, equality and promoting tolerance, and serves as a monument to the pride and solidarity of the LGBT community in France and beyond. The event continues to attract attention and support, playing an important role in promoting inclusivity and respect for diversity in society.

The Supreme Court of India did not support the legalization of same-sex marriage, leaving the issue for parliament

The Supreme Court of India has declined the proposal for the legalization of same-sex marriage, underlining the significance of upholding the rights of LGBTQ+ individuals. A panel of five judges from the Supreme Court concluded that such a decision should fall within the purview of Parliament, the primary legislative authority in the nation, and that amendments to the existing Marriage Law were outside their jurisdiction.

In India, over 21 million people, constituting more than 1.5% of the population, openly identify themselves as part of the LGBTQ+ community, with the actual number potentially being even higher.

The Indian government has expressed its opposition to legislative alterations aimed at legalizing same-sex marriage, characterizing the arguments in favor of the proposition as “reflective of urban elite perspectives” and contending that they do not align with the traditional Indian family structure of husband, wife, and children.

The viewpoints among the Supreme Court judges were divided with a ratio of 2:3. Chief Justice Dhananjaya Chandrachud, in his concluding statement, emphasized that “the concept of marriage lacks a universally applicable definition” and argued that the matter of recognizing and regulating same-sex marriage should be entrusted to Parliament and state legislatures.

According to his perspective, the institution of marriage primarily gains legal significance through its regulation by the state and the provision of certain material benefits. In this context, the court does not possess the authority to make determinations regarding this institution, as the country’s Constitution does not explicitly establish an individual’s direct right to marriage, unlike, for example, the right to life and personal liberty.

Nonetheless, Justice Chandrachud underscored that certain facets of marital relationships reflect constitutional values, including the right to human dignity, life, and personal liberty. He also highlighted that the court should refrain from intervening in policy matters and should not have the authority to amend the Special Marriage Act.

The second most senior judge in the Supreme Court, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, underscored that while same-sex relationships have been acknowledged in India since ancient times, legal recognition has only been extended to unions between individuals of different genders.

Additionally, he emphasized that while the court cannot confer the right to marry upon LGBTQ+ citizens, it does possess the authority to provide recommendations to the government. Notably, he stressed the importance of ensuring that the rights of same-sex couples are safeguarded in accordance with the principles enshrined in the Constitution.

Multidirectional emotions: disappointment and approval in connection with the Supreme Court decision


The reaction to the Supreme Court’s ruling has been diverse and mixed. Those directly impacted by these developments expressed natural disappointment.

We pay the same taxes as heterosexual couples and encounter the same, if not more, challenges. Yet, we still feel like second-class citizens,” voiced Archie Dutt, a gay student from Delhi.

Pia Chanda, who has been living with her partner for 34 years, criticized the Supreme Court for essentially “shifting responsibility” to Parliament and evading making its own decisions.

However, lawyer and writer Tanushree Bhalla believes that the court acted in accordance with the law and hopes that “the government will heed the court’s recommendations and take the necessary measures to put an end to the discrimination faced by LGBTQ+ individuals on a daily basis, both in legal matters and in everyday life.”

She expressed optimism that the legal framework will evolve in step with societal progress. Adish Aggarwal, President of the Supreme Court Bar Association, partially echoed her sentiments. He expressed satisfaction that the court aligned with the government’s stance, asserting that the matter of legalizing same-sex marriage falls beyond the court’s jurisdiction and should exclusively be determined by the Indian Parliament.

However, it’s noteworthy that even prior to the decision, he had voiced opposition to the prospect of legalizing same-sex marriage, deeming it incompatible with “the prevailing system in India.”

Many activists advocating for the rights of sexual minorities had hoped that, if not marriage, at least civil unions for same-sex couples would become lawful following the court’s ruling. Nevertheless, the Supreme Court denied them this opportunity, emphasizing that this issue should also be left to parliament’s discretion. Additionally, the court did not permit same-sex couples to formally adopt children.

Although the judges held differing opinions, they all arrived at the same consensus that legislative amendments fall under the purview of parliament, with the court’s role solely being the interpretation of laws.

While Chief Justice Chandrachud and Justice Kaul held the view that it is the government’s duty to ensure LGBTQ+ citizens are granted “a complete spectrum of rights and privileges” on par with those enjoyed by heterosexual couples, Justice Bhat dissented, arguing that such demands should not be placed on the state. The second unanimous decision was to endorse the government’s proposal to establish an expert panel to examine the expansion of LGBTQ+ rights.

Recommendations to the government and the police

Activists and supporters of LGBTQ community walk a pride parade in Chennai on June 26, 2022. (Photo by Arun SANKAR / AFP) (Photo by ARUN SANKAR/AFP via Getty Images)


Towards the end of the proceedings, Justice Chandrachud presented a set of recommendations to the government, which included the following key points:

Guarantee that the queer community is shielded from discrimination based on their gender identity or sexual orientation.

Ensure that LGBTQ+ individuals face no discrimination when accessing goods and services available to all other members of society.

Undertake initiatives to enhance public awareness about LGBTQ+ individuals and their identity, emphasizing its naturalness and dispelling misconceptions of it being a mental disorder.

Establish a dedicated service accessible to LGBTQ+ citizens who have encountered persecution or violence in any form.

Publish information detailing the availability of shelters for LGBTQ+ citizens in all regions, offering them refuge in instances of violence or discrimination.

Put an immediate end to practices by medical professionals or others aimed at altering gender identity or sexual orientation.

The police also received a list of recommendations, including the following directives:

Prohibit the harassment of same-sex couples through summons to police stations or home visits solely for the purpose of verifying their gender identity or sexual orientation.

Respect the choices of queer individuals who do not wish to return to their families.

When queer individuals approach the police with complaints of domestic harassment, the police are mandated to investigate the legitimacy of these complaints and ensure the personal freedom and safety of the complainants.

Christian College Expels LGBT Students: Petition Has 120,000 Support

In Brisbane, Australia, a Christian college is encouraging parents to sign an agreement that provides the right to expel students who are openly LGBT+.

Citipointe sent an updated student admission agreement to parents before the start of the new semester. This document describes homosexuality as a sin and “immoral behavior” compared to other prohibited acts such as bestiality, incest and pedophilia.

The school document asserts that they view any type of sexual misconduct, encompassing behaviors such as debauchery, homosexual and bisexual acts, bestiality, incest, pedophilia, pornography, and more, as morally unacceptable and contrary to their religious beliefs. They believe that such actions are offensive to God, detrimental to interpersonal connections, and have a negative impact on society.

According to the terms of the contract, new students are only allowed to continue their studies if “their gender identity matches their biological sex.”

College Principal, Pastor Brian Mulheran, said: “We are dedicated to preserving our Christian principles and enabling parents and students to make well-informed decisions regarding their willingness to endorse and adopt our Christian education philosophy”

Mulheran emphasized that Citipointe has no intention of showing bias against students due to their sexual orientation or gender identity, and admissions decisions will not be solely predicated on these factors.. However, Mulheran’s statements contradict the new contract, which clearly states that the college has the right to expel a student if his sex does not correspond to the institution’s biological sex.

However, the move has sparked heated debate and criticism from the public and LGBT+ rights advocates. Many have expressed concern that the institution’s policies could promote discrimination and create a hostile environment for LGBT+ students.


Activists said Citipointe College’s contract is discriminatory and violates the rights of LGBT+ students. They underscored the significance of establishing a welcoming and secure atmosphere for all students, regardless of their sexual orientation or gender identity.

This event became an occasion for discussion of the legality and ethics of such policies in educational institutions and emphasized the relevance of issues related to the rights of LGBT+ people in the educational field. Meanwhile, debate on this issue continues, and many are waiting for further developments and solutions in this area.

The decision of the educational institution causes criticism from society

A petition was created to protest the new rules introduced by the Citipointe educational institution. This petition essentially accuses the school of discriminating against students who belong to the queer and transgender communities. A similar initiative has collected almost 120 thousand signatures. The petition’s author, Bethany Lau, encourages anyone who shares her concerns about Citipointe’s policies, which she considers transphobic and homophobic, to sign. It is important for her and her supporters to convey to the school and the public that such forms of discrimination will not be left unanswered and will be actively opposed.